Hi Eugene, On 3 September 2017 at 03:41, Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> So, should I expect a new version of this patch? > Well, this change is incorporated in v2—I decided just to mention that > in case syscall failed due to exceed in hashname size, syscall fails > with EINVAL (and no with ENOENT, for example, when no algorithm with > the provided name found): Ahhh -- yes, sorry. I confused the patch series. Cheers, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
