On 07/06/2017 09:23 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > Zach Reizner pointed out a mismatch between kernel behavior and the > man-page documentation of SECCOMP_RET_KILL which kills tasks not > processes. Thanks, Kees. Applied. Cheers, Michael > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > man2/seccomp.2 | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man2/seccomp.2 b/man2/seccomp.2 > index 7d0e721..b805154 100644 > --- a/man2/seccomp.2 > +++ b/man2/seccomp.2 > @@ -371,9 +371,9 @@ In decreasing order of precedence, > the values that may be returned by a seccomp filter are: > .TP > .BR SECCOMP_RET_KILL > -This value results in the process exiting immediately > +This value results in the task exiting immediately > without executing the system call. > -The process terminates as though killed by a > +The task terminates as though killed by a > .B SIGSYS > signal > .RI ( not > @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ install_filter(int syscall_nr, int t_arch, int f_errno) > system calls */ > BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), > > - /* [7] Destination of architecture mismatch: kill process */ > + /* [7] Destination of architecture mismatch: kill task */ > BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL), > }; > > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
