On Thu, Aug 10 2017, Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote: > Mr Poettering, > > > I don't know exactly what is the whole discussion about but Mr > consider (very seriously) this regarding C language, C coding, > compilers and program execution: > > claim #1: "==" is compare operator another words result is considered > to be true if both arguments are same binary > > claim #2: it is possible to compare different types to each other, e.g. > int to char, long long to short > > claim #3: if both arguments are of different sizes then compiler > extends shorter type to the size of larger argument padding with 0s. > > claim #4: compiler uses type of variable for immediate constant when > comparing the variable to it. thus even bitfields comparisons work. > > claim #5: the compiler is modern gcc > > thus your whole thesis is damn crap especially your claim like "Linux > is broken". you could write glibc is broken because it does not > "expose" (which is not strictly true) the fsword_t > > Do you know what the term "Linux" stands for ? > I can give you explanation but there are so many other noble developers > which can do this better and it is disappointing that they haven't done > this yet. > > > I could ignore your email like others did but once upon I gave you a > proof that because systemd-logging can't do better recovery than > underlying file system then doing so by systemd-logging is utterly > stupid, so if you, Mr Poettering, stop doing more userspace crap then > whole "Linux" will only benefit from this. > > > And the Red Hat should fire you out. > I reckon that fools are the worst plague in the World and that's why I > stopped tolerating fools. > I am a racist - I hate fools. Please keep the discussion civil. This sort of language is not welcome. NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
