Hi Carlos, On 05/05/2017 09:51 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/19/2017 11:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> The documentation around symbol versioning as used by the glibc dynamic >> linker (DL) is currently rather weak, and I'd like to add some pieces to >> various man pages (ld.so(8), dlsym(3), and possibly others) to improve >> this situation. Before that though, I'd rather like to check my >> understanding of the rules. > > This is great! > > Can I make one simple request? > > Please post all of your test case and we help you get them checked into > glibc's regression testsuite so we don't change any of the behaviour you > have documented without noticing it. > > I'd like us to agree to ensure we cover everything you mention in a > regression test. I'm happy to help here, bug do not have a CLA, and do not plan to get one. But, I can place whatever code might be useful under a permissive license (assuming that works for you). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
