Hi Bill,
Please re-read the original text. It ("that that") is okay, I believe.
Cheers,
Michael
On 09/26/2016 05:35 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> man2/vfork.2 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/man2/vfork.2 b/man2/vfork.2
> index 6f20900df4ae..ce03bcd67541 100644
> --- a/man2/vfork.2
> +++ b/man2/vfork.2
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ can't be implemented on such systems.
> .BR vfork ()
> from the standard; the POSIX rationale for the
> .BR posix_spawn (3)
> -function notes that that function,
> +function notes that the function,
> which provides functionality equivalent to
> .BR fork (2)+ exec (3),
> is designed to be implementable on systems that lack an MMU.)
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
