Re: [PATCH] perf_event_open.2: 4.9 PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_DRV_CONFIGS support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> 
> I am adding an interface to pass PMU specific configuration to the
> driver.  Since PMU drivers exist for different architecture and
> drivers I am making the mechanism as generic as possible.

It's a shame we are ending up with two "string configuration" ioctls.
PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER and this new one.  Though I guess
PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER is not really set up to be used generically.

> "@cfg" and "@cfg=option".  The lexer will strip off the '@' and pass
> "cfg" and "cfg=option" to the kernel.
> 
> What gets sent down to the kernel is driver specific - it is up to the
> PMU drivers to parse and validate what's given to them.

But the core kernel is parsing "=" and "," in this case, so it's not 
entirely up to the PMU driver, right?

Is there going to be a list of allowed keywords somewhere, under /sys
or similar?

>> .TP
>> .BR PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_DRV_CONFIGS " (since Linux 4.9)"
>> Pass custom configuration paramaters to a PMU driver.
>>
>> The argument is a pointer to a NUL-termiated string of up to
>> PAGE_SIZE in length.
>> The string contains a list of comma-separated configuration options
>> that will be parsed by the kernel.
>> The kernel handles both singleton values as well as name/value pairs
>> that are indicated with the '=' character.
>> The size of the strings is limited internally to PERF_DRV_CONFIG_MAX
>> (which is not visible to userspace).
>>

> Yes this is a very good description but in sharp contrast with what is
> currently done for the ioctl() descriptors in this page.  I shied away
> from writing that much based on how slim the current descriptions were.

Well that's because this interface is a lot more complex than some of the 
other ioctls which just take a simple integer (or no argument at all).

The ftrace ioctl description could definitely use some expansion.

> > some additional questions: can this ioctl be run at any time or should
> > only be run while the event is quiet?  Does the change in options take
> > place immediately?

> That is up to PMU drivers to decide - for CoreSight it is set only
> once when trace sessions are created.  Any changes from thereon will
> be ignored.

Then shouldn't this be set at perf_event_open() and not by an ioctl()?

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux