[PATCH] unix.7: Explain that MSG_NOSIGNAL is useless for recvmsg(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



recvmsg(2) never causes a "Broken pipe" error but the unix(7) man page implies
that MSG_NOSIGNAL can be used in the flags of recvmsg(2) to avoid sending a
SIGPIPE. Fixes Bug 137351.

Signed-Off-By: Laurent Georget <laurent.georget@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
 man7/unix.7 | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Michael,

I found the culprit line in unix(7). It can be misleading indeed because it
that it makes sense to use MSG_NOSIGNAL as a flag to recvmsg(2) to avoid a
SIGPIPE but recvmsg(2) actually never triggers such an error. I propose the
patch below to fix this.

Best regards,

Laurent Georget

diff --git a/man7/unix.7 b/man7/unix.7
index 82715f9..fce5eb2 100644
--- a/man7/unix.7
+++ b/man7/unix.7
@@ -515,12 +515,12 @@ Remote socket was closed on a stream socket.
 If enabled, a
 .B SIGPIPE
 is sent as well.
-This can be avoided by passing the
+Sending the signal can be avoided by passing the
 .B MSG_NOSIGNAL
 flag to
 .BR sendmsg (2)
-or
-.BR recvmsg (2).
+.RB ( recvmsg (2)
+never causes such an error).
 .TP
 .B EPROTONOSUPPORT
 Passed protocol is not
-- 
2.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux