On 06/03/2016 09:53 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/02/2016 05:25 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> The convention for man-pages is that new sentences always start >> of new source lines. (This makes subsequent patches less "noisy", >> since the common unit of change in a text is a sentence.) >> Could you fix this throughout please? > > Yep, I can do that, and I'll also integrate all of your comments, > although I won't respond to all of them individually, I will integrate them. > >>> +no longer be used in any protection-key-related operations. >>> +.PP >>> +.RB ( pkey_alloc ()) >>> +.I flags >>> +may contain zero or more disable operations: >> >> Why "zero or more" rather than "zero or one"? I mean: >> what sense could it make to OR together PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and >> PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE? > > This is one of the attributes of the hardware that I carried up in to > the interfaces. The hardware contains two bits: one to write-disable > and one to access-disable. You're allowed to set both at the same time, > even though the "access" bit overrules the "write" bit when set. > > So, it doesn't make a ton of logical sense with these two flags, but it > might if we ever got an "execute disable" feature or some other feature > that could be combined more arbitrarily. So, I have a suggestion. How about tightening the constraint here, so that only one of these flags is allowed for now. (EINVAL if both are specified.) That constraint could always be relaxed later , if desired, and adding it now may allow some wriggle room later in terms of modifying the API or allowing for different architectural choices. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
