On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:57:54 +0100 Michael Kerrisk wrote: > On 04/16/2016 05:30 PM, Alexander Miller wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 00:50:58 -0400 > > Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> imo, we should just drop all compression support. distros already > >> handle this properly and pick whatever they want/need. > > [...] > > > > We can drop compression support or do it right - I'm fine with > > either option. We shouldn't keep the status quo, though. > > I'm inclined to say drop it. Would you mind putting together a > patch, Alex? I'm not sure what exactly we should do. The problem isn't really compressing the files, but the "screen" and "uninstall" targets. If we drop support for compressing man pages ourselves, what shall we do with those targets? They aren't useful for distros either. And they *still* might have to deal with files compressed by the distro's package manager (if a user tries to update manually). We could - drop "screen" and/or "uninstall", too (getting rid of the problem and simplifying the Makefile but being inconvenient for users); - fix them to handle man pages compressed by the distro (but not compressed sources, resulting in only slightly simpler patches than those I've posted); - or explicitly state "screen" (and maybe "uninstall") don't support compressed files. This is problematic IMO, especially since they are used by "make all". Moreover, "uninstall" can remove .gz/.bz2 files but no .xz files right now; this could be changed to include .xz or to exclude .gz/.bz2. What do you want me to drop/fix with a new patch? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
