[Bug 103701] timegm() manpage suggests a terrible workaround

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103701

--- Comment #2 from Stephen Hurd <shurd@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I'm not sure why the manpage documents how to not use the function (obviously,
documenting *why* not to use it makes sense.)

If there's honestly no good way to emulate timegm() in a threadsafe manner,
should its use really be discouraged?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux