On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Paul Eggert wrote: > analyzers that the array in question may be larger. It also adds a > compile-time option (default off) to simply use flexible arrays without the > backwards-compatibility hack. We could use that option in Gnulib. I don't think such a compile-time option is desirable (especially not undocumented, all feature test macros should be documented in creature.texi); we shouldn't profilerate feature-test macros for things that aren't well-defined API groups. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
