Re: backtrace(3): Inconsistency and missing indentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 10:26 AM, Martin Gebert wrote:
>> In the example section of the page the following snippet is given:
>>
>> --8><--
>>         void
>>         myfunc3(void)
>>         {
>>             int j, nptrs;
>>         #define SIZE 100
>>             void *buffer[100];
>>             char **strings;
>>
>>             nptrs = backtrace(buffer, SIZE);
>> --><8--
>>
>> Problems:
>>
>>  1. "#define SIZE 100" is not indented correctly.
>>  2. SIZE should also be used for the buffer array size.
>
> Thanks, Martin. Fixed as below.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> diff --git a/man3/backtrace.3 b/man3/backtrace.3
> index afca93d..064b970 100644
> --- a/man3/backtrace.3
> +++ b/man3/backtrace.3
> @@ -215,8 +215,8 @@ void
>  myfunc3(void)
>  {
>      int j, nptrs;
> -#define SIZE 100
> -    void *buffer[100];
> +    const int SIZE = 100;
> +    void *buffer[SIZE];
>      char **strings;
>
>      nptrs = backtrace(buffer, SIZE);

I suggest leaving it as it was, apart from using SIZE in the definition
of buffer.

It's common for preprocessor directives to be left-justified rather
than aligned with the surrounding code.  (They mostly appear at file
scope, so it's not usually an issue.)  It's perfectly valid to indent
the #define, but it's a bit misleading, since it implies that SIZE has
a scope (it doesn't, it's visible to the end of the translation unit).

With the "const int" declaration, buffer becomes a VLA (variable
length array).  VLAs don't exist in C90, do exist in C99, and are
optional in C11.  The code won't compile with "gcc -pedantic-errors".

Given the need to support C90, I suggest that the #define is still
the best way to define the constant.  You could use an enum hack:

    enum { size = 100 };
    void *buffer[size];

but that's a little obscure, and introduces an issue that's not
relevant to the backtrace() function.

-- 
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux