On 18/12/15 12:11 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 16:54 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hello Darren,
On 12/15/2015 10:18 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:43:50PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[...]
>> When executing a futex operation that requests to block a thread,
>> the kernel will block only if the futex word has the value that
>> the calling thread supplied (as one of the arguments of the
>> futex() call) as the expected value of the futex word. The load‐
>> ing of the futex word's value, the comparison of that value with
>> the expected value, and the actual blocking will happen atomi‐
>>
>> FIXME: for next line, it would be good to have an explanation of
>> "totally ordered" somewhere around here.
>>
>> cally and totally ordered with respect to concurrently executing
>
> Totally ordered with respect futex operations refers to semantics of the
> ACQUIRE/RELEASE operations and how they impact ordering of memory reads and
> writes. The kernel futex operations are protected by spinlocks, which ensure
> that that all operations are serialized with respect to one another.
>
> This is a lot to attempt to define in this document. Perhaps a reference to
> linux/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt as a footnote would be sufficient? Or
> perhaps for this manual, "serialized" would be sufficient, with a footnote
> regarding "totally ordered" and a pointer to the memory-barrier documentation?
I think I'll just settle for writing serialized in the man page, and be
done with it :-).
I'd prefer if you'd not just use "serialized" :) Eventually, I'd prefer
if we can explain the semantics for the user in terms of the terminology
and semantics of the memory model of the programming language that users
will likely use to call futex ops (ie, C11 / C++11).
FWIW a couple of uses of "serialized" were replaced in the C++11 final
draft due to comments pointing out that term is not defined in the
standard, see http://wg21.link/lwg1494 and http://wg21.link/lwg1504
That's not quite the same, because an ISO standard is supposed to
define all terms it uses, even for something like "serialized" where
the meaning is commonly understood by those in the field.
But I do like Torvald's suggestion to describe the semantics in
similar terms to C11, because that's the user-space model that
non-kernel folks (like me) are more likely to be familiar with.
Overall I like the new page a lot, I found it clear and readable. Nice
work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
