Hello Mark, Sorry for the delay in following up. Thanks for the proposal. Could you take a look at the comments below and revise your patch? On 05/26/2015 04:58 PM, Mark Hills wrote: > Rather than the detail of SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK getting long, move this > to its own section where it can grow to include the information with > greater clarity. > > Added a description of the behaviour against a blocking file > descriptor, including an important gotcha. > > I have aimed to keep to the section headings specified in man-pages(7). > > The description that "splice() may nevertheless block because the file > descriptors that are spliced to/from may block" remains although I did > not observe or investigate this behaviour myself. I think the changelog entry could be clearer. It seems to me that the second paragraph is the key point, and it should come at the top. Also, that paragraph could note what the gotcha actually is (see also my comment below). And, then, surely this patch is more than a refactoring, so I'd title the patch differently... not sure what's best here though; do you have a suggestion? > --- > man2/splice.2 | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man2/splice.2 b/man2/splice.2 > index 035aac4..cf1e2f6 100644 > --- a/man2/splice.2 > +++ b/man2/splice.2 > @@ -105,13 +105,11 @@ call); > in the future, a correct implementation may be restored. > .TP > .B SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK > -Do not block on I/O. > -This makes the splice pipe operations nonblocking, but > -.BR splice () > -may nevertheless block because the file descriptors that > -are spliced to/from may block (unless they have the > -.B O_NONBLOCK > -flag set). > +Make the splice operation itself nonblocking. See the New sentences should start on new lines please. > +.B NOTES > +on > +.B Nonblocking behaviours man-pages uses American spelling consistently. s/iours/iors/ (and below also) > +below. > .TP > .B SPLICE_F_MORE > More data will be coming in a subsequent splice. > @@ -184,6 +182,41 @@ library support was added to glibc in version 2.5. > .SH CONFORMING TO > This system call is Linux-specific. > .SH NOTES > +.SS Nonblocking behaviours > +Whether > +.BR splice () > +may block is influenced by the > +.B O_NONBLOCK > +flag on > +.I fd_in > +and > +.IR fd_out , > +and the > +.B SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK > +flag. > + > +Without > +.B SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK > +the behaviour of the underlying > +file descriptors defines when the > +.BR splice() > +operation will block. > + > +If > +.B SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK > +is set then the movement of data within > +.BR splice() > +is unblocking. s/unblocking/nonblocking/ > +However, > +.BR splice() > +may nevertheless block because the file descriptors that > +are spliced to/from may block. > +Care should be taken with this flag as > +.BR splice() > +will not block if data from a blocking file descriptor is not resident > +in memory; there can be a difference in behaviour where file > +content is or is not already cached to RAM. I'm not disputing your assertion here, but how did you verify this last point? It would be good to include that information in the commit message. > +.SS Related calls > The three system calls > .BR splice (), > .BR vmsplice (2), Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
