Hi, I'd like to propose a small change. I often open the printf(3) manual page, and this beginning with several variants (fprintf, sprintf...) implicitly suggested me for many years that this list was kinda complete. I just randomly came across dprintf(3) (while visiting http://ewontfix.com/10/). Of course, dprintf(3) is mentioned in the "see also" section of printf(3), so strictly speaking I should've noticed it much sooner, I just overlooked it. I don't find it logical that some printf variations (f, s, sn) are documented in the same manual page, while another that's not more different from these (d) is not. I'd like to recommend refactoring, and integrating dprintf(3) (and probably asprintf(3) too) in the basic printf(3) manual page. It's also more useful if "man 3 dprintf" brings up the complete documentation, rather than just the feature test macros and the confirmance specification, and points to another manpage for the rest. Thanks for considering, egmont -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
