[Bug 95331] fcntl.2 + sigaction.2 + signal.7 need further information about use of a SA_SIGINFO signal handler that uses si->si_fd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95331

--- Comment #2 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Incidentally, nowhere do the man-pages state that unless you use 
an SA_ONSTACK handler, having used sigaltstack() to set the 
stack used to invoke the handler, then you get garbage pointed
to by the siginfo_t 'si' pointer 2nd parameter to the handler,
which is definitely the case.
Also, unless you actually call fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signum), then
no si->_sifields._sigpoll information is set at all - the 
manual pages definitely suggest that SIGIO / SIGPOLL is the
default, but do not mention that the default does not apply
to SA_SIGACTION signal handlers .

Oh well, I was hoping to avoid having to do so, but I guess there
is no alternative to making the program use poll / pselect .
But the documentation is definitely in need of clarification of
the above points.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux