On 03/15/2015 02:13 AM, Stéphane Aulery wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stéphane Aulery <saulery@xxxxxxx> > --- > man2/vfork.2 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man2/vfork.2 b/man2/vfork.2 > index 0354456..0f90b2a 100644 > --- a/man2/vfork.2 > +++ b/man2/vfork.2 > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ can't be implemented on such systems. > .BR vfork () > from the standard; the POSIX rationale for the > .BR posix_spawn (3) > -function notes that that function, > +function notes that function, Actually, this is correct English. The "that"s are different. Cheers, Michael > which provides functionality equivalent to > .BR fork (2)+ exec (3), > is designed to be implementable on systems that lack an MMU.) > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
