Am 12.03.2015 16:20, schrieb Alexei Starovoitov: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:09 AM, walter harms <wharms@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> +.SH DESCRIPTION >>> +.BR bpf() >>> +syscall is a multiplexor for a range of different operations on extended BPF >> syscall is a multiplexor for a range of different operations on extended >> Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF). >> >> just introduce the abv. early as possible, >> > > I'd rather not. The universal feedback from everyone was > that eBPF name is ugly, awkward, hard to pronounce, hard to > remember, hard to spell, etc. > So I'm trying not to use it, if I can. Often when people > say 'bpf' they mean 'extended' one and > when they need to refer to old they say 'classic bpf'. it is not abut the (e) is about the BPF. you say "Berkeley Packet Filter" a few lines later. just move that in the first line where you are using BPF as abbreviation. It is good practice to have an explaination before using the abrev. re, wh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
