Re: manpages-dev: please note thread safeness of %m in vfprintf(3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Ma Shimiao,

Le lundi 09 mars 2015 à 02:20:07, Ma Shimiao a écrit :
> 
> On 03/07/2015 06:38 PM, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> > 
> > A Debian user has applied to mention that strerror_r(3) is thread safe.
> > 
> >> Frome Martin Godisch <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:30:30 +0200
> >>
> >> Please add a note to vfprintf(3) telling users that the %m conversion
> >> specifier is thread safe.
> 
> I'm not sure why he need a note to indicate that the %m conversion specifier 
> is thread safe.
> From our research and glibc's document, vfprintf(3) is thread safe except when users pass float formatting,
> custom formatting or single quota may cause locale dependency problem.
> And I'm going to add thread safety information of vfprintf() into printf.3.
> If there is something special about %m, we'd like to know.
> And I'm willing to add it.

I will send you answer to Martin Godisch, but I don't think there is something
special. I will wait your patch before closing this bug.

Thanks.

Regards,

-- 
Stéphane Aulery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux