This manpage patch relates to the addition of PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
support added in the following commit:
perf_sample_regs_intr; Linux 3.19
commit 60e2364e60e86e81bc6377f49779779e6120977f
Author: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
perf: Add ability to sample machine state on interrupt
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: cebbert.lkml@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411559322-16548-2-git-send-email-eranian@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>From what I can tell the primary difference between
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR and the existing PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
is that the new support will return kernel register values
(I assume that's not some sort of info leak?).
In theory also when precise_ip is set high enough you should
get the PEBS register state rather than the PMU interrupt
register state, but I was unable to construct a test case
on a Haswell system where I got different values with
precise_ip=0, precise_ip=2, or by using PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
instead. Am I missing something about how to use this new
interface?
Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/man2/perf_event_open.2 b/man2/perf_event_open.2
index 39c8d8c..ca03928 100644
--- a/man2/perf_event_open.2
+++ b/man2/perf_event_open.2
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
__u32 sample_stack_user; /* size of stack to dump on
samples */
__u32 __reserved_2; /* Align to u64 */
-
+ __u64 sample_regs_intr; /* regs to dump on samples */
};
.fi
.in
@@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ and
.I sample_stack_user
in Linux 3.7.
.\" commit 1659d129ed014b715b0b2120e6fd929bdd33ed03
+.B PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4
+is 104 corresponding to the addition of
+.I sample_regs_intr
+in Linux 3.19.
+.\" commit 60e2364e60e86e81bc6377f49779779e6120977f
.TP
.I "config"
This specifies which event you want, in conjunction with
@@ -752,6 +757,23 @@ event must be measured or no values will be recorded.
Also note that some perf_event measurements, such as sampled
cycle counting, may cause extraneous aborts (by causing an
interrupt during a transaction).
+.TP
+.BR PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR " (since Linux 3.19)"
+.\" commit 60e2364e60e86e81bc6377f49779779e6120977f
+Records a subset of the current CPU register state
+as specified by
+.IR sample_regs_intr .
+Unlike
+.B PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
+the register values will return kernel register
+state if the overflow happened while kernel
+code is running.
+If the CPU supports hardware sampling of
+register state (as does PEBS on x86) and
+.I precise_ip
+is set higher than zero then the register
+values returned are those captured by
+hardware.
.RE
.TP
.IR "read_format"
@@ -1855,6 +1877,9 @@ struct {
u64 weight; /* if PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT */
u64 data_src; /* if PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC */
u64 transaction;/* if PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION */
+ u64 abi; /* if PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR */
+ u64 regs[weight(mask)];
+ /* if PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR */
};
.fi
.RS 4
@@ -2242,6 +2267,27 @@ the high 32 bits of the field by shifting right by
.B PERF_TXN_ABORT_SHIFT
and masking with
.BR PERF_TXN_ABORT_MASK .
+.TP
+.IR abi ", " regs[weight(mask)]
+If
+.B PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
+is enabled, then the user CPU registers are recorded.
+
+The
+.I abi
+field is one of
+.BR PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE ", " PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32 " or "
+.BR PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64 .
+
+The
+.I regs
+field is an array of the CPU registers that were specified by
+the
+.I sample_regs_intr
+attr field.
+The number of values is the number of bits set in the
+.I sample_regs_intr
+bit mask.
.RE
.TP
.B PERF_RECORD_MMAP2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
