On 05/02/2015 15:17, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 20 January 2014 at 18:28, Eliezer Tamir > <eliezer.tamir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 20/01/2014 18:28, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>> On 07/10/2013 04:18 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote: >>>> Add description for the SO_BUSY_POLL socket option to the socket(7) manpage. >>> >>> Long after the fact, I've applied this. Thanks, Eliezer. >>> >>> Would you be willing also to write a patch for the POLL_BUSY_LOOP flag of >>> poll()? >> >> Yes, Me or someone from our team will do that. > > Hi Eliezer, > > Could you or someone from your team send me a POLL_BUSY_LOOP doc patch? Hi Michael, Right now POLL_BUSY_LOOP is only used internally to control busylooping, as a signal between sock_poll() and do_poll(). Our original intention was to expose that to the users of epoll(). The work on epoll() support is not finished yet. I think we should not document this until we finalize epoll() support. Thanks, Eliezer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
