Hello Hirofumi,
On 3 February 2015 at 10:44, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Quick reviewed, and looks good. However, entry[0].d_reclen == 0 works as
>>> backward compatibility though. The example might be good to use usual
>>> way of getdents().
>>>
>>> I.e., "ret" means
>>> -1 == error
>>> 0 == EOD
>>> 0 > how many bytes read
>>
>> Sorry -- I do not really understand what you mean here
>> "entry[0].d_reclen == 0 works as backward compatibility though"). Is
>> the line
>>
>> if (ret == -1 || entry[0].d_reclen == 0)
>>
>> incorrect? If yes, what should the code look like?
>
> Sorry. I meant, "entry[0].d_reclen == 0" check works because fatfs still
> have backward compatibility code. However it would not be preferred way.
>
> In ancient version, fatfs didn't return proper return code, so apps (I
> know only use is wine) had to check "entry[0].d_reclen == 0" to know
> EOD.
>
> But for a long time, fatfs returns proper return code like said in
> previous email (previous email was wrong on "0 > how many bytes read",
> see below instead). I.e., now user can use "ret" as similar to
> getdents(), user can know the result as usual from "ret" without
> "entry[0].d_reclen == 0".
>
> while (1) {
> ret = ioctl();
> if (ret == -1) {
> /* error */
>
> if (ret == 0)
> /* EOD */
>
> /* got entry (would be ret == 1) */
> }
Thanks for the clarification. I have one other question. Currently the
man page does not document two fields in the __fat_dirent structure:
d_ino and d_offset. d_ino is presumably the inode number. But, what is
d_offset?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
