Re: futex(2) man page update help request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Torvald,

On 01/24/2015 02:12 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 12:35 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> So we should never see -EINTR in the case of a spurious wakeup here.
>>
>> But, here is the not so good news:
>>
>>  I did some archaeology. The restart handling of futex_wait() got
>>  introduced in kernel 2.6.22, so anything older than that will have
>>  the spurious -EINTR issues.
>>
>> futex_wait_pi() always had the restart handling and glibc folks back
>> then (2006) requested that it should never return -EINTR, so it
>> unconditionally restarts the syscall whether a signal had been
>> delivered or not.
>>
>> So kernels >= 2.6.22 should never return -EINTR spuriously. If that
>> happens it's a bug and needs to be fixed.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this.
> 
> Michael, can you include the above in the documentation please?  This is
> useful for userspace code like glibc that expects a minimum kernel
> version.  Thanks!

I've added some text to my draft to cover this point.

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux