Re: utimensat(2) may/must confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm reluctant to note that point too prominently, since it's
> obviously not the kind of thing we want to encourage user-space
> programmers to do, but at the bottom of NOTES, I added:
>
>        If  both  tv_nsec  fields  are  specified as UTIME_OMIT, then the
>        Linux implementation of utimensat() succeeds  even  if  the  file
>        referred to by dirfd and pathname does not exist.
>
> Okay?

sgtm. anyone who tries to use that man page without carefully reading
the NOTES and BUGS sections is going to have a bad time anyway. (plus
i suspect that one day this will migrate to the BUGS section :-) )

thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux