On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The program counter will be as though the system call happened >>> (i.e., it will not point to the system call instruction). >>> The return value register will contain an architecture\-dependent value; >>> if resuming execution, set it to something sensible. >>> .\" FIXME Regarding the preceding line, can you give an example(s) >>> .\" of "something sensible"? (Depending on the answer, maybe it >>> .\" might be useful to add some text on this point.) >> >> This means sensible in the context of the syscall made, or the desired >> behavior. For example, setting the return value to ELOOP for something >> like a "bind" syscall isn't very sensible. > > Okay -- I did s/sensible/appropriate for the system call/ Yes, perfect. That captures it nicely. >>> .\" >>> .\" FIXME Please check: >>> .\" In an attempt to make the text clearer, I changed >>> .\" "replacing it with" to "setting the return value register to" >>> .\" Okay? >>> (The architecture dependency is because setting the return value register to >>> .BR ENOSYS >>> could overwrite some useful information.) >> >> Well, the arch dependency is really because _how_ to change the >> register, and the register itself, is different between architectures. >> (i.e. which ptrace call is needed, and which register is being >> changed.) The overwriting of useful information is certainly true too, >> though. > > So, revert to the previous wording? Or do you have a suggested > better wording? I think the previous wording is better. I'm struggling to produce language that makes more sense here. > Thanks. We're getting close now. Excellent! :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
