Hello Heinrich
Thank you for working on this!
@Ted: could you please review the next version of
Heinrich's page?
Heinrich, see my comments below.
On 09/13/2014 03:15 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Kernel 3.17 introduces a new system call getrandom(2).
>
> The man page in this patch is based on the commit message by
> Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>
> CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> man2/getrandom.2 | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 198 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 man2/getrandom.2
>
> diff --git a/man2/getrandom.2 b/man2/getrandom.2
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e649eea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/man2/getrandom.2
> @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
> +.\" Copyright (C) 2014, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> +.\" Copyright (C) 2014, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>
> +.\"
> +.\" %%%LICENSE_START(VERBATIM)
> +.\" Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
> +.\" manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
> +.\" preserved on all copies.
> +.\"
> +.\" Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of
> +.\" this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that
> +.\" the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of
> +.\" a permission notice identical to this one.
> +.\"
> +.\" Since the Linux kernel and libraries are constantly changing, this
> +.\" manual page may be incorrect or out-of-date. The author(s) assume.
> +.\" no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting.
> +.\" from the use of the information contained herein. The author(s) may.
> +.\" not have taken the same level of care in the production of this.
> +.\" manual, which is licensed free of charge, as they might when working.
> +.\" professionally.
> +.\"
> +.\" Formatted or processed versions of this manual, if unaccompanied by
> +.\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
> +.\" %%%LICENSE_END
> +
> +.TH GETRANDOM 2 2014-09-13 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> +.SH NAME
> +getrandom \- fill buffer with random bytes
> +.SH SYNOPSIS
> +.B #include <linux/random.h>
> +.sp
> +.BI "int getrandom(void *"buf ", size_t " buflen ", unsigned int " flags );
> +.SH DESCRIPTION
> +The system call
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +fills the buffer pointed to by
> +.I buf
> +with up to
> +.I buflen
> +random bytes which can be used to seed user space random number
s/user space/user-space/
> +generators (i.e., DRBG's) or for other cryptographic uses.
Here, I assume DBRGs means "Deterministic Random Bit Generators".
Best to write that in full, so that some readers are not left
puzzled by the acronym.
> +It should not be used for Monte Carlo simulations or other programs/algorithms
> +which are doing probabilistic sampling.
It would be helpful to add to that last sentence an explanation of
_why_ it should not be thus used.
> +.PP
> +.I flags
> +is a bit mask.
> +The following bits can be set in
> +.IR flags :
I'd rather see:
The
.I flags
argument is a bit mask that can contain zero or
more of the following values ORed together:
> +.TP
> +.B GRND_RANDOM
> +If this flags bit is set, then random bytes are draw from the
s/flags//
s/draw/drawn/
> +.I /dev/random
> +pool instead of the
> +.I /dev/urandom
> +pool.
> +The
> +.I /dev/random
> +pool is limited based on the entropy that can be obtained from environmental
> +noise, so if there is insufficient entropy, the requested number of bytes may
> +not be returned.
> +.TP
> +.B GRND_NONBLOCK
> +If this bit is set and there is no entropy available at all,
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +will return -1 with
> +.I errno
> +set to
> +.BR EAGAIN .
> +If the
> +.B GRND_NONBLOCK
> +bit is not set and there is no entropy available at all
s/all/all,/
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +will block.
I think it would be better to move the piece about OpenBSD's
getentropy() call to a subsection under NOTES, perhaps headed
.SS Emulating OpenBSD's getentropy()
> +.PP
> +The
> +.BR getentropy ()
> +system call in OpenBSD can be emulated using the following
> +function:
> +
> +.in +4n
> +.nf
> +int
> +getentropy(void *buf, size_t buflen)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (buflen > 256)
> + goto failure;
> + ret = getrandom(buf, buflen, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret == buflen)
> + return 0;
> +failure:
> + errno = EIO;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +.fi
> +.in
> +.SH RETURN VALUE
> +On success,
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +returns the number of bytes that were copied to the buffer
> +.IR buf .
> +This may not be all the bytes requested by the caller via
> +.I buflen
> +if insufficient entropy was present in the
> +.IR/dev/random pool ,
Missing space after "IR"
> +or if the system call was interrupted by a signal.
> +.PP
> +On error, -1 is returned, and
> +.I errno
> +is set appropriately.
> +.SH ERRORS
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +An invalid flag was passed to
> +.BR getrandom ().
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +The address referenced in parameter
> +.I buf
> +is outside the accessible address space.
> +.TP
> +.B EAGAIN
> +The requested entropy was not available, and
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +would have blocked if the
> +.B GRND_NONBLOCK
> +flag was not set.
> +.TP
> +.B EINTR
> +While blocked waiting for entropy, the call was interrupted by a signal
> +handler; see the description of how interrupted
> +.BR read (2)
> +calls on "slow" devices are handled with and without the
> +.B SA_RESTART
> +flag in the
> +.BR signal (7)
> +man page.
Did you test whether SA_RESTART has an affect for getrandom()?
(For many system calls it is ignored.) I've not tested this,
but reading the source suggests that it does.
> +.SH NOTES
> +For small requests
> +.RI ( buflen
> +<= 256)
s/$/,/
> +.IR getrandom ()
s/.IR getrandom ()/.BR getrandom ()/
(The same error needs fixing in other places too.)
> +will not return
> +.B EINTR
> +when reading from the
> +.I /dev/urandom
> +pool once the entropy pool has been initialized,
> +and it will return all of the bytes that have been requested.
I find the previous sentence rather hard to understand. Can you
reword/enhance? To be clear: above, you mean that if "buflen"
is <= 256, then getrandom() will not fail with EINTR if interrupted
by a signal handler, right? Here, I think you are also talking
about the case where GRND_RANDOM is not specified. Assuming that
is so, I think you need to say that explicitly in this paragraph.
> +This is the recommended way to use
The meaning of "This" is not clear here, especially given the
complexity of the previous sentence.
> +.BR getrandom (),
> +and is designed for compatibility with OpenBSD's
> +.BR getentropy ()
> +system call.
> +.PP
> +However, if you are using
> +.BR GRND_RANDOM ,
> +then
> +.IR getrandom ()
> +may block until the entropy accounting determines that sufficient environmental
> +noise has been gathered such that
> +.IR getrandom ()
> +will be operating as a NRBG instead of a DRBG for those people who are working
Write "Nondeterministic Random Bit Generator"
> +in the NIST SP 800-90 regime.
Perhaps a pointer to where the reader can get further info about
"the NIST SP 800-90 regime" would be helpful here. Do you have one?
> +Since it may block for a long time, these guarantees do NOT apply.
Please use
.I not
for emphasis in the previous line.
> +The user may want to interrupt a hanging process using a signal, so blocking
> +until all of the requested bytes are returned would be unfriendly.
> +.PP
> +For this reason, the user of
> +.IR getrandom ()
> +MUST always check the return value, in case it returns some error,
> +or if fewer bytes than requested was returned.
> +In the case of
> +.RB ! GRND_RANDOM
> +and small request, the latter should never happen, but the careful userspace
s/the careful userspace/careful user-sapce/
> +code (and all crypto code should be careful) should check for this anyway!
> +.PP
> +Finally, unless you are doing long-term key generation (and perhaps not even
> +then), you probably shouldn't be using
> +.B GRND_RANDOM.
> +The cryptographic algorithms used for
> +.I /dev/urandom
> +are quite conservative, and so should be sufficient for all purposes.
> +The disadvantage of
> +.I GRND_RANDOM
s/.I/.B/
> +is that it can block, and the increased complexity required to deal with
> +partially fulfilled
> +.IR getrandom ()
> +requests.
I'd write that last piece as a new sentence:
Furthermore, the need to deal with partially fulfilled
.IR getrandom ()
requests increases code complexity.
> +.SH VERSIONS
> +.BR getrandom ()
> +was introduced in version 3.17.0 of the Linux kernel for the x86 and amd64 architecture,
> +.\" FIXME . Patch is in next-20140913.
> +and is expected to be delivered in 3.18.0 for other architectures.
Remove the ".0" at the end of the two previous kernel versions.
> +.SH CONFORMING TO
> +This system call is Linux-specific.
The order of the .SH sections in this page does not match the order
given in man-pages(7). Could you please reorder for the next version.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
