On 08/16/2014 05:58 AM, Vince Weaver wrote: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>> +If the additional >>> +.I comm_exec >>> +flag can be set (starting with Linux 3.16) >> >> Would that last line be better as: >> >> flag is set (possible since Linux 3.16) >> > > It's tricky wording, as you can always set the flag, but the actual open > call will fail pre-3.16 if the flag is set. > > Maybe > "flag is successfully set (possible since Linux 3.16)" > > might be better? Thanks. So, I've now made it [[ If the .I comm_exec flag is also successfully set (possible since Linux 3.16), then the misc flag .B PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC can be used to differentiate the .BR exec (2) case from the others. ]] Okay? Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html