Re: [PATCH] fsync_range, was: Re: munmap, msync: synchronization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:34:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Christoph, if this is going into the kernel, can you add support for
> xfs_io and write a couple of xfstests to test it? I'm not
> comfortable with adding new data integrity primitives to the kernel
> without having robust validation infrastructure already in place for
> it. It might also be worthwhile looking to extend Josef's
> fsync-tester.c to be able to use ranged fsyncs so to test all the
> various corner cases that we need to....

If we actually want to add it will obviously need test coverage.  Seem
like I can't really get people excited enough to make this more than a
PoC so far, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux