Am 10.03.2014 11:01, schrieb Marius Gaubas: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Marius Gaubas <marius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:21:20PM +0000, Marius Gaubas wrote: >>>> 1. nlink_t st_nlink member goes after mode_t st_mode, not before @struct stat >>> Apologies, the correct statement is: >>> >>> nlink_t st_nlink member is before mode_t st_mode, not after @struct stat >> >> "I'm sorry HAL, what are are you trying to tell me?" >> >> Translation: Could you _please_ communicate as though there are human >> beings on this list? What are you trying to tell us, and what is your >> evidence? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael >> >> >> -- >> Michael Kerrisk >> Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ >> Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ > > Hello Michael, > > Please accept my apologies for a BOT-like e-mail. > > My name is Marius Gaubas > (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/marius-gaubas/5b/63b/3a4). > hello nice to meet you. > The evicence is very clear. I invoke syscall:stat directly from assembly > code and in the debugger I clearly see see that st_nlink (==2) goes > before st_mode (==040700). It clearly makes sense: 8 8 4 8 is not > aligned. The series reflects the sizes of the first for structure > members. st_nlink/st_mode values are clearly specific to my test, I hope > that's clear. Ok, you are talking about the sequence the fields are stored in the structure ? re, wh > Kind regards, > Marius > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
