Re: RFC: Bug 60749 - Do not need to link against -lm for fabs*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Walter,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, walter harms <wharms@xxxxxx> wrote:
> hi list,
> i was investigating this and the good news it that you still need a libm.
> On the other side the reporter is right he does not need to specify that.
> Obviously this depends on the linker script used.
>
> The math man pages say: "Link with -lm".
> Perhaps it is better to say 'You may need to Link with -lm".
>
> any comments on that ?


Thanks for looking at this bug. Could you elaborate a little more on
what it/sin't in the linker script that makes the difference?

Thanks,

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux