Re: [PATCH 1/4] io_cancel.2: fix up the description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> chrubis@xxxxxxx writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>> > The description for this sytem call was a bit inaccurate.  Cyril
>>> > still takes issue with my wording, so this is up for further
>>> > word-smithing, I think.  I'm open to suggestions.
>>>
>>> Cyril, do you have any comment?
>>
>> It is no big deal but I think that the sentence could be a little clearer
>> with explicitly stating that the ctx_id is aio context and the iocb
>> describes the operation to be canceled. Something like:
>>
>> The
>> .I iocb
>> describes the operation to be canceled and the
>> .I ctx_id
>> is aio context the operation was submitted to.
>
> I agree that this is better.  Thanks Cyril!


So, in the end, I have

       The  iocb  argument  describes the operation to be canceled
       and the ctx_id argument is the AIO  context  to  which  the
       operation  was submitted.

Okay?

Thanks,

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux