On Tuesday 09 April 2013 14:08:18 Peter Schiffer wrote: > My aim here is, that when I'm opening man page in section 2, the first > thing I'm expecting to see is syscall signature. In clone(2), it's not > even clear that this is a library call. err, the very first sentence of the first paragraph says it's exactly this: clone() creates a new process, in a manner similar to fork(2). It is actually a library function layered on top of the underlying clone() system call, hereinafter referred to as sys_clone. A description of sys_clone is given toward the end of this page. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
