Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/send(2): add EPERM to the list of possible errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael,

Do you see any problem with these two patches?

Thanks,
Fernando


On 2013/03/19 15:45, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] man/send(2): add EPERM to the list of possible errors

System policy (for example netfilter rule) can cause a send* operation
to fail with EPERM.

Reported-by: Hirotaka Sasaki <sasaki.hirotaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff -urNp man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2
--- man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2	2013-03-15 16:17:32.000000000 +0900
+++ man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2	2013-03-19 15:17:03.616008275 +0900
@@ -357,6 +357,10 @@ Some bit in the
  .I flags
  argument is inappropriate for the socket type.
  .TP
+.B EPERM
+System policy (for example a netfilter rule) does not permit the requested
+operation.
+.TP
  .B EPIPE
  The local end has been shut down on a connection oriented socket.
  In this case the process
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux