Re: [RFC v3 0/3] vmpressure_fd: Linux VM pressure notifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:53:49AM -0800, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is the third RFC. As suggested by Minchan Kim, the API is much
> simplified now (comparing to vmevent_fd):
> 
> - As well as Minchan, KOSAKI Motohiro didn't like the timers, so the
>   timers are gone now;
> - Pekka Enberg didn't like the complex attributes matching code, and so it
>   is no longer there;
> - Nobody liked the raw vmstat attributes, and so they were eliminated too.
> 
> But, conceptually, it is the exactly the same approach as in v2: three
> discrete levels of the pressure -- low, medium and oom. The levels are
> based on the reclaimer inefficiency index as proposed by Mel Gorman, but
> userland does not see the raw index values. The description why I moved
> away from reporting the raw 'reclaimer inefficiency index' can be found in
> v2: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/22/177
> 
> While the new API is very simple, it is still extensible (i.e. versioned).

Sorry, I didn't follow previous discussion on this, but could you
explain what's wrong with memory notifications from memcg?
As I can see you can get pretty similar functionality using memory
thresholds on the root cgroup. What's the point?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux