[PATCH] ptrace.2: Explain behaviour should ptrace tracer call execve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This behaviour was verified by reading the kernel source and confirming
the behaviour using a test program.

Applies to latest git repo.

Kind regards,

James.
--
James Hunt
____________________________________
http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook
http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook/upstart_cookbook.pdf
>From 44d1bffe6dfbaeaae3e0bafb7ec626eb362f97e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Hunt <james.hunt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:53:18 +0100
Subject: Explain behaviour should ptrace tracer call execve.

---
 man2/ptrace.2 |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/man2/ptrace.2 b/man2/ptrace.2
index c45e569..d051358 100644
--- a/man2/ptrace.2
+++ b/man2/ptrace.2
@@ -1660,6 +1660,9 @@ In Linux kernels before 2.6.26,
 .BR init (8),
 the process with PID 1, may not be traced.
 .LP
+A tracees parent continues to be the tracer even if that tracer calls
+.BR execve (2).
+.LP
 The layout of the contents of memory and the USER area are
 quite operating-system- and architecture-specific.
 The offset supplied, and the data returned,
-- 
1.7.9.5


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux