Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Could you possibly also rearchitect the patch series please, in the > light of the following: > * There have been a (very) few changes to upstream ld.so.8, so you'll > need to rebase. Sure, no problem. > * Please clearly separate out those pieces that simply bridge the gap > between upstream ld.so.8 and Debian ld.so.8 and those pieces that are > your own enhancements. (I did correctly understand that there are some > of those, right?). Do I understand correctly that you want first a patch that makes it look just like Debian's ld.so.8, and after that patches that make it more palatable? That doesn't seem quite right to me --- for example, it would mean first reverting the changes to upstream ld.so.8 and then reapplying them again. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
