On 08/18, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 17.08.11 15:45, Oleg Nesterov (oleg@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > You should mark the whole process as sub-reaper, not a single thread > > which does prctl(). The parent/child relationship is process-wide. > > Hmm, how would we implement this best? Would it be sufficient to follow > group_leader pointer to set/get the flag, You can mark task->group_leader. Or, probably better, task->signal. INHO, the best option is SIGNAL_SUB_REAPER in signal->flags. But this is not possible until we cleanup the usage of signal->flags. > and to follow real_parent OOPS. I simly can't understand how I managed to miss this. Of course, in any case you should follow ->real_parent, not ->parent! Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
