[PATCH] ioperm: Update port range description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In recent Linux versions the I/O port range limitation for ioperm() is gone.


Signed-off-by: Adam Lackorzynski <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 man2/ioperm.2 |   11 ++++-------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man2/ioperm.2 b/man2/ioperm.2
index 3470a8d..1d55ad1 100644
--- a/man2/ioperm.2
+++ b/man2/ioperm.2
@@ -51,14 +51,11 @@ sets the port access permission bits for the calling process for
 If \fIturn_on\fP is nonzero, the calling process must be privileged
 .RB ( CAP_SYS_RAWIO ).
 
-.\" FIXME is the following ("Only the first 0x3ff I/O ports can be
-.\" specified in this manner") still true?  Looking at changes in
-.\" include/asm-i386/processor.h between 2.4 and 2.6 suggests
-.\" that the limit is different in 2.6.
-Only the first 0x3ff I/O ports can be specified in this manner.
-For more ports, the
+Up to Linux 2.6.7 only the first 0x3ff I/O ports can be specified in this
+manner.  For more ports, the
 .BR iopl (2)
-system call must be used.
+system call must be used. With Linux 2.6.8 or later all I/O ports can be
+specified.
 
 Permissions are not inherited by the child created by
 .BR fork (2).
-- 
1.7.2.3


Adam
-- 
Adam                 adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Lackorzynski         http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux