Hello Yuri, On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Yuri Kozlov <yuray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello. > > Next two paragraph is contradict. > > If the call is interrupted by a signal handler, clock_nanosleep() returns > -1, and sets errno to EINTR. > > And below: > RETURN VALUE > On successfully sleeping for the requested interval, > clock_nanosleep() returns 0. If the call is interrupted by a > signal handler or encounters an error, then it returns a positive > error number. > > So, return value is positive or -1 ? Thanks. This was in fact independently reported a few weeks ago, and this fix was applied: --- a/man2/clock_nanosleep.2 +++ b/man2/clock_nanosleep.2 @@ -124,9 +124,7 @@ that terminates the process. If the call is interrupted by a signal handler, .BR clock_nanosleep () -returns \-1, and sets -.I errno -to +fails with the error .BR EINTR . In addition, if .I remain Cheers, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
