Re: lseek(2) BSD buglet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 02:13:35PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> lseek(2) (noticed on 3.23, 3.25 has similar wording) says, in part,
> 
>        SVr1-3 returns long instead of off_t, BSD returns int.
> 
> While the BSDs are not a single monolithic entity, NetBSD has returned
> off_t from lseek(2) since 1.5 at the very latest, meaning late 2000.
> I'd be surprised if there's a non-orphaned BSD left that still uses
> int.
> 
> I'm not sure what wording would be best.  Depends on whether you think
> it's worth mentioning the historical practice from the days when BSD
> deserved the B in its name or not, I'd say.  Perhaps something like

I think removing it is fine.  Historical SysV and BSD behaviour might have
been interesting in the early 90s, but these days it's something for a
history book and not a manual page.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux