Re: [Bug libc/11459] New: ftw doesn't work like documented (may be a documentation bug)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See below a bug reported against the glibc.  Since the glibc maintainer
dodged that one, I assume the bug indeed is in the documentation of
ftw(3). My manpages are the 3.24-1 Debian package.

IMHO the patch is:

 -fpath is the pathname of the entry relative to dirpath.
 +fpath is the pathname of the entry relative to the current working directory.

POSIX is very vague about what "fpath" should be btw.


On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:26:09PM -0000, madcoder at debian dot org wrote:
> The man page states:
> 
>        int ftw(const char *dirpath,
>                int (*fn) (const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
>                           int typeflag),
>                int nopenfd);
> 
>        [...]
> 
>        fpath is the  pathname  of  the  entry  relative to dirpath.
> 
> Though it appears that it is the pathname of the entry relative to the current 
> working directory.
> 
> FWIW this may be a documentation bug since the similar fts interface clearly 
> states that the similar fts_accpath is relative to the current working 
> directory.
> 
> -- 
>            Summary: ftw doesn't work like documented (may be a documentation
>                     bug)
>            Product: glibc
>            Version: unspecified
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: libc
>         AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
>         ReportedBy: madcoder at debian dot org
>                 CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
> 
> 
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 08:11:46PM -0000, drepper at redhat dot com wrote:
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com  2010-04-03 20:11 -------
> The man pages do not come with glibc and are in no way authoritative.  You have
> to report this elsewhere.
> 
> -- 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |INVALID
> 
> 
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux