On Friday 13 November 2009 11:41:33 Petr Baudis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:26:18AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 13 November 2009 10:53:05 Martin Gebert wrote: > > > >> I just found this ambiguities in stdint.h(0p) (from package > > > >> man-pages-posix-2003a on a current Gentoo system): > > > > > > > > the posix man pages are not maintained here. they're maintained by > > > > the austin/posix group > > > > > > FYI, Gentoo portage reports http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ as the > > > homepage for this package, which finally redirects bug reports to you. > > > I'm still trying to find a contact to POSIX/Austin... > > > > that's because this place converts the posix pages into man page form. > > but it doesnt manage the actual content. > > But actually, the bug reported here _is_ a conversion issue - the > superscript is transcribed inline without any delimitation, while it > should probably have additional parentheses. The original has no issue > since the proper part of the formula is superscripted unambiguously. indeed. i misread the original report, thanks for pointing it out. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
