Hi, On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:57:05AM -0500, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > I agree that there's a problem with the page, but I don't think this > patch is sufficient, nor does is it made in quite the right place. > (This isn't a point that relates specifically to "%s", but rather to > the *s*printf() functions.) > > I made a much bigger change that goes into more detail. The patch, > destined for 3.16, is shown below. Does it look okay to you? I agree that it is better. Just out of curiosity, can you think of any other conversions than %s that would cause this? Maybe I missed something obvious but I could not think of anything. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The average, healthy, well-adjusted adult gets up at seven-thirty in the morning feeling just terrible. -- Jean Kerr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
