Quoting Michael Kerrisk (mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > Hi Serge, > > I assume you've considered the pros and cons of mentioning > > signal semantics with respect to init tasks of child pid namespaces, > > and decided it's not worth mentioning yet as the semantics are not > > yet finalized? > > > > The goal is to treat the process as a system-wide init with respect > > to signals coming from its own namespace, and treat it as an ordinary > > task for signals coming from its ancestor namespaces. But as you've > > probably read, the implementation may result in some unfortunate > > side-effects regarding blocked signals etc. > > No I haven't considered this at all. Could you provide some pointers > to relevant discussions on this? The discussions are going on right now on lkml (see for instance http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/124). But I think Nadia has already written something up. Nadia, could you send what you have to Michael? thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
