Hi Pavel, [...] >> *** Here's where I make the point about each process having multiple PIDs" >> >>>> +The existence of a namespace hierarchy means that each process >>>> +may now have multiple PIDs: >>>> +one for each namespace in which it is visible. >> >> I added some words here: >> >> "each of these PIDs is unique within the corresponding namespace". > > Correct. Thanks for the ACK. >>>> +(A call to >>>> +.BR getpid (2) >>>> +always returns the PID associated with the namespace in which >>>> +the process was created.) >>> I don't thinks it's a good example - the getpid cannot be called >>> for other process other than current :) >> >> It wasn't meant as an example. The point was, with a process >> potentially being a member of multiple namespaces, the reader might >> wonder: what does getpid(2) return? This sentence was intended to >> clarify that. With that explanation, does this sentence now seem >> okay? > > Yes, but I'd change "was created" into "lives in". From my POV this > sounds more clear. I do not insist however :) Done. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
