Bother! Mail to Paul Jackson bounced from the last address I had for him. Anyway know an up-to-date address? On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > pj@xxxxxxx > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 cuda_nsu 5.7.1 <pj@xxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: THIS USER IS NO LONGER WITH SGI. CONTACT help@xxxxxxx IF YOU NEED INFO. (state 14). > > ----- Original message ----- > > Received: by 10.180.222.1 with SMTP id u1mr289004bkg.62.1226677136648; > Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:38:56 -0800 (PST) > Received: by 10.181.33.19 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:38:56 -0800 (PST) > Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0811140738i33f2c671kc99bbb7750f2fa44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:38:56 -0500 > From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx > To: "Loic Domaigne" <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: For review: pthread_setaffinity_np.3 > Cc: linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, josv@xxxxxxxxxx, > "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > "Stefan Puiu" <stefanpuiuro@xxxxxxxxx>, > "Karsten Weiss" <K.Weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > In-Reply-To: <cfd18e0f0811140704l18e5741fgdbb5a6c52fb8cbe7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > References: <cfd18e0f0811041447w57dd5de4he68ca780ed963074@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > <4916133A.8060209@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > <cfd18e0f0811140704l18e5741fgdbb5a6c52fb8cbe7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [CC += "Paul Jackson" <pj@xxxxxxx>, who might want to Ack the patch below] > >>> This might be obvious to all of you, but it wasn't to me... The CPU set used >>> for the affinity is the intersection of the set passed to >>> pthread_setaffinity_np() and the set of processors supported by the >>> kernel... >>> >>> That's why your example shall work, even if the system where it runs has >>> less than 8 processors. >> > > ----- Message truncated ----- > > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
