On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think the correct approach is to consider it a bug if functions do not >> set errno, or do not raise exceptions - that is, all of (b), (c) and (d) are >> bugs. This would allow math_errhandling to be MATH_ERRNO|MATH_ERREXCEPT >> unless translation units are compiled with options preventing this, and make >> the error handling options available consistent across the math.h functions >> supported by glibc. To conform with C99, at least one approach (errno or >> exceptions) must be consistently supported across all the functions, in any >> case. > > I've reported bugs for all of the non-conformances I found. What I really should have said here is "non-conformances and deviations from the/my ideal that all errors would be reported both via errno and exceptions". Anyway, one for the list: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6814 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
