Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Somebody please make a call and then let's go on with life.  I don't
> care much either way anymore.  I do hope nobody thinks this is an issue
> which can be completely ignored (see, e.g., the bug I pointed to the
> other day).

Its very hard to do that without knowing what other Unixlike and POSIX OS
plan to do and if we'll end up with a third yet again different API to
support when it reaches a standards body.

We shouldn't be seeing this as a Linux problem, its a BSD problem, an AIX
problem, a Solaris problem and an HPUX problem and really wants one
solution applying across distributions or it will harm everyone in the
long term.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux