Hi Thadeu,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 13:27, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
<cascardo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the past, each rtc implementation had to rewrite the same ioctls in
order to be compatible. But since 2006, a common RTC interface has been
introduced. Use it for the last user of RTC_MINOR.
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
--- a/arch/m68k/bvme6000/rtc.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/bvme6000/rtc.c
static int __init rtc_DP8570A_init(void)
{
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+
if (!MACH_IS_BVME6000)
return -ENODEV;
pr_info("DP8570A Real Time Clock Driver v%s\n", RTC_VERSION);
- return misc_register(&rtc_dev);
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "rtc-generic", -1,
+ &dp8570a_rtc_ops,
+ sizeof(dp8570a_rtc_ops));
Doesn't this conflict with the creation of the same device in rtc_init()[1]?
On BVME6000, mach_hwclk is set:
arch/m68k/bvme6000/config.c: mach_hwclk = bvme6000_hwclk;
+
+ return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev);
}
module_init(rtc_DP8570A_init);
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13.4/source/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c#L144
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
