Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] arch: m68k: Add STACKTRACE support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi there,

On 21/10/2024 11:44, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
In order to use tracing, implement a basic arch_stack_walk() based on
the one in PowerPC.
Tested on a M54418 coldfire.

Well, I said it was tested, but it was only compile tested basically.
AFAICT now, I think it is not working as when I use wakeup_rt as a tracer, I don't have the stack trace:

# wakeup_rt latency trace v1.1.5 on 6.12.0-10380-gb66f06337b66-dirty
# --------------------------------------------------------------------
# latency: 2000 us, #18/18, CPU#0 | (M:preempt VP:0, KP:0, SP:0 HP:0)
#    -----------------
#    | task: irq/100-enet-fe-118 (uid:0 nice:0 policy:1 rt_prio:50)
#    -----------------
#
#                    _------=> CPU#
#                   / _-----=> irqs-off/BH-disabled
#                  | / _----=> need-resched
#                  || / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                  ||| / _--=> preempt-depth
#                  |||| / _-=> migrate-disable
#                  ||||| /     delay
#  cmd     pid     |||||| time  |   caller
#     \   /        ||||||  \    |    /
kworker/-11 0dnh5. 0us : 11:120:R + [000] 22: 98:R irq_work/0
kworker/-11        0dnh5.    0us : <stack trace>
kworker/-11        0dnh5.    0us : 0
kworker/-11        0d..3.    0us : __schedule
kworker/-11 0d..3. 0us : 11:120:R ==> [000] 22: 98:R irq_work/0
kworker/-11        0d..3.    0us : <stack trace>
telnetd-229 0Dnh4. 0us : 229:120:R + [000] 118: 49:R irq/100-enet-fe
 telnetd-229       0Dnh4.    0us : <stack trace>
 telnetd-229       0Dnh4.    0us : 0
 telnetd-229       0D..3.    0us : __schedule
telnetd-229 0D..3. 0us : 229:120:R ==> [000] 118: 49:R irq/100-enet-fe
 telnetd-229       0D..3.    0us : <stack trace>
telnetd-229 0dn.5. 0us : 229:120:R + [000] 118: 49:R irq/100-enet-fe
 telnetd-229       0dn.5.    0us : <stack trace>
 telnetd-229       0dn.5.    0us#: 0
 telnetd-229       0d..3. 2000us : __schedule
telnetd-229 0d..3. 2000us : 229:120:R ==> [000] 118: 49:R irq/100-enet-fe
 telnetd-229       0d..3. 2000us : <stack trace>

Geert, Greg, and maybe other highly skilled m68k people, could you please help me with this particular function :-) ?

Thanks !
JM


Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/m68k/Kconfig             |  5 ++++
  arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile     |  1 +
  arch/m68k/kernel/stacktrace.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 76 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
index ab3375475721fa63418c40d4ba6ac76679ebc77d..7142f9759181a90269ae1ba9e682d331ee2ddbf6 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ config M68K
  	select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
  	select ZONE_DMA
  	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
+	select ARCH_STACKWALK
config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  	def_bool y
@@ -107,6 +108,10 @@ config BOOTINFO_PROC
  	  Say Y to export the bootinfo used to boot the kernel in a
  	  "bootinfo" file in procfs.  This is useful with kexec.
+config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
+	bool
+	default y
+
  menu "Platform setup"
source "arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu"
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile b/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
index f335bf3268a108a45bab079fbf0a1c8ead9beb71..4efe92af0b711b19cb1d5129f74e67a739e289b1 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
@@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UBOOT)		+= uboot.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o +obj-y += stacktrace.o
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/stacktrace.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06c7459373bd25b3bb3540cfe2a909259c1db3ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+/*
+ * Stack trace utility functions etc.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2024 Jean-Michel Hautbois, Yoseli SAS.
+ */
+
+#include <asm/current.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
+#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
+
+static inline unsigned long current_stack_frame(void)
+{
+	unsigned long sp;
+
+	asm volatile("movl %%sp, %0" : "=r"(sp));
+	return sp;
+}
+
+static inline int validate_sp(unsigned long sp, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	unsigned long stack_start, stack_end;
+
+	if (task == current)
+		stack_start = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(task);
+	else
+		stack_start = (unsigned long)task->thread.esp0;
+
+	stack_end = stack_start + THREAD_SIZE;
+
+	if (sp < stack_start || sp >= stack_end)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+void __no_sanitize_address arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
+					   struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned long sp;
+
+	if (regs && !consume_entry(cookie, regs->pc))
+		return;
+
+	if (regs)
+		sp = (unsigned long) regs;
+	else if (task == current)
+		sp = current_stack_frame();
+	else
+		sp = task->thread.ksp;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		unsigned long *stack = (unsigned long *) sp;
+		unsigned long newsp, ip;
+
+		if (!validate_sp(sp, task))
+			return;
+
+		newsp = stack[0];
+		ip = stack[1];
+
+		if (!consume_entry(cookie, ip))
+			return;
+
+		sp = newsp;
+	}
+}






[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux